↓ Skip to main content

A genome-wide association analysis identifies PDE1A | DNAJC10 locus on chromosome 2 associated with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension in a Japanese population

Overview of attention for article published in Oncotarget, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
A genome-wide association analysis identifies PDE1A | DNAJC10 locus on chromosome 2 associated with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension in a Japanese population
Published in
Oncotarget, August 2017
DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.20459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mai Kimura, Yuichi Tamura, Christophe Guignabert, Makoto Takei, Kenjiro Kosaki, Nobuhiro Tanabe, Koichiro Tatsumi, Tsutomu Saji, Toru Satoh, Masaharu Kataoka, Shigeo Kamitsuji, Naoyuki Kamatani, Raphaël Thuillet, Ly Tu, Marc Humbert, Keiichi Fukuda, Motoaki Sano

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a lethal disease that often affects the young. Although Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor Type 2 gene (BMPR2) mutations are related with idiopathic and heritable PAH, the low penetrance and variable expressivity in PAH suggest the existence of other genetic and/or environmental factors. In this study, we aimed to identify novel genetic factors associated with PAH, irrespective of BMPR2 mutation. We performed genome-wide association study (GWAS) in a Japanese population comprising 44 individuals with idiopathic and heritable PAH, and 2,993 controls. Seven loci identified in the genome-wide study were submitted to the validation study, and a novel susceptibility locus, PDE1A|DNAJC10, was identified that maps to 2q32.1 (rs71427857, P = 7.9 × 10(-9), odds ratio in the validation study = 5.18; 95% CI 1.86 - 14.42). We also found the augmentation of PDE1A protein in distal remodeled pulmonary artery walls in idiopathic PAH patients. Given that phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors are effective for the treatment of idiopathic and heritable PAH, our findings suggest that PDE1A could be a novel therapeutic target of PAH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 26%
Mathematics 1 4%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,575,277
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Oncotarget
#8,471
of 14,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,247
of 317,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncotarget
#578
of 1,056 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,056 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.