↓ Skip to main content

Health policy for sickle cell disease in Africa: experience from Tanzania on interventions to reduce under‐five mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Medicine & International Health, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
Health policy for sickle cell disease in Africa: experience from Tanzania on interventions to reduce under‐five mortality
Published in
Tropical Medicine & International Health, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/tmi.12428
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Makani, Deogratias Soka, Stella Rwezaula, Marlene Krag, Janneth Mghamba, Kaushik Ramaiya, Sharon E. Cox, Scott D. Grosse

Abstract

Tanzania has made considerable progress towards reducing childhood mortality, achieving a 57% decrease between 1980 and 2011. This epidemiological transition will cause a reduction in the contribution of infectious diseases to childhood mortality and increase in contribution from non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Haemoglobinopathies are among the most common childhood NCDs, with sickle cell disease (SCD) being the commonest haemoglobinopathy in Africa. 10,313 children with SCD under 5 years of age (U5) are estimated to die every year, contributing an estimated 7% of overall deaths in U5 children. Key policies that governments in Africa are able to implement would reduce mortality in SCD, focusing on newborn screening and comprehensive SCD care programmes. Such programmes would ensure that interventions such as prevention of infections using penicillin plus prompt diagnosis and treatment of complications are provided to all individuals with SCD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 222 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 16%
Student > Bachelor 36 16%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 63 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 68 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Medicine & International Health
#1,094
of 3,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,677
of 367,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Medicine & International Health
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.