| Title |
Raw Genomic Data: Storage, Access, and Sharing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Genetics, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tig.2017.10.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mahsa Shabani, Danya Vears, Pascal Borry |
| Abstract |
Patients are increasingly being encouraged and supported to access and control their own medical and genomic data. We argue that well-established and transparent raw genomic data retention and returning policies are imperative to enable patients to practice their rights to access and control raw data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 27% |
| Belgium | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,283,005
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Genetics
#370
of 2,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,746
of 339,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Genetics
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.