↓ Skip to main content

Herpès génital et grossesse : outils du diagnostic virologique. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du Collège national des gynécologues obstétriciens français (CNGOF)

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Herpès génital et grossesse : outils du diagnostic virologique. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du Collège national des gynécologues obstétriciens français (CNGOF)
Published in
Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.10.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Vauloup-Fellous

Abstract

To describe serological and molecular tools available for genital and neonatal herpes, and their use in different clinical situations. Bibliographic investigations from MedLine database and consultation of international clinical practice guidelines. Virological confirmation of genital herpes during pregnancy or neonatal herpes must rely on PCR (Professional consensus). HSV type-specific serology (IgG) will allow determining the immune status of a patient (in the absence of clinical lesions). However, there is currently no evidence to justify universal HSV serological testing during pregnancy (Professional consensus). In case of genital lesions in a pregnant woman that do not report any genital herpes before, it is recommended to perform a virological confirmation by PCR and HSV type-specific IgG in order to distinguish a true primary infection, a non-primary infection associated with first genital manifestation, from a recurrence (Grade C). HSV IgM is useless for diagnosis of genital herpes (Grade C). If a pregnant woman has personal history of genital herpes but no lesions, whatever the gestational age, it is not recommended to perform genital sampling nor serology (Professional consensus). In case of recurrence, if the lesion is characteristic of herpes, virological confirmation is not necessary (Professional Agreement). However, if the lesion is not characteristic, virological confirmation by PCR should be performed (Professional consensus). At birth, HSV PCR samples should be collected as soon as neonatal herpes is suspected (symptomatic neonate) (best before beginning antiviral treatment but must not delay the treatment), or after 24hours of life in case of asymptomatic neonate born to a mother with herpes lesions at delivery (Professional consensus). Clinical samples for virological confirmation should include at least blood and a peripheral location. In case of clinical manifestations of herpes in the neonate, first samples PCR positive, preterm birth, or maternal primary infection or non-primary infection associated with first genital manifestation at delivery, CSF should also be collected as well as samples of lesions in the neonate if present (Professional consensus). Sampling should be repeated in case of PCR negative but strong evidence of neonatal herpes (Professional consensus). HSV serology is useless for diagnosis of neonatal herpes (Grade C). Virological confirmation for diagnosis of genital herpes during pregnancy or neonatal herpes must rely on PCR. PCR assays available in France are very reliable. Specific IgG are dedicated to restricted indications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,789,745
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite
#183
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,861
of 338,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.