| Title |
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 3.2017.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0176 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samir Gupta, Dawn Provenzale, Scott E Regenbogen, Heather Hampel, Thomas P Slavin, Michael J Hall, Xavier Llor, Daniel C Chung, Dennis J Ahnen, Travis Bray, Gregory Cooper, Dayna S Early, James M Ford, Francis M Giardiello, William Grady, Amy L Halverson, Stanley R Hamilton, Jason B Klapman, David W Larson, Audrey J Lazenby, Patrick M Lynch, Arnold J Markowitz, Robert J Mayer, Reid M Ness, Niloy Jewel Samadder, Moshe Shike, Shajanpeter Sugandha, Jennifer M Weiss, Mary A Dwyer, Ndiya Ogba |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 28% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,294,544
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#1,424
of 1,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,038
of 447,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#27
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.