| Title |
A One-Page Summary Report of Genome Sequencing for the Healthy Adult
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Health Genomics, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1159/000370102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason L. Vassy, Heather L. McLaughlin, Calum A. MacRae, Christine E. Seidman, Denise Lautenbach, Joel B. Krier, William J. Lane, Isaac S. Kohane, Michael F. Murray, Amy L. McGuire, Heidi L. Rehm, Robert C. Green |
| Abstract |
As genome sequencing technologies increasingly enter medical practice, genetics laboratories must communicate sequencing results effectively to nongeneticist physicians. We describe the design and delivery of a clinical genome sequencing report, including a one-page summary suitable for interpretation by primary care physicians. To illustrate our preliminary experience with this report, we summarize the genomic findings from 10 healthy participants in a study of genome sequencing in primary care. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 19% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,270,728
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Genomics
#29
of 383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,288
of 352,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Genomics
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.