| Title |
Translation and Validation of a Spanish-Language Genetic Health Literacy Screening Tool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Psychology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1037/hea0000162 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sally Ann Rodríguez, Debra L. Roter, Carlos Castillo-Salgado, Gillian W. Hooker, Lori H. Erby |
| Abstract |
Literacy deficits and underutilization of medical services have been linked to health disparities among minorities, and this appears especially relevant for the Latino population. Given the increasing importance of genetics, assessment of genetic health literacy may direct future efforts to better serve this vulnerable population. The current study was designed to contribute to this area by translating and validating a Spanish-language genetic health literacy measure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health Psychology
#1,666
of 2,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,982
of 361,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Psychology
#43
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.