↓ Skip to main content

The Edinburgh CT and genetic diagnostic criteria for lobar intracerebral haemorrhage associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy: model development and diagnostic test accuracy study

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Neurology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Edinburgh CT and genetic diagnostic criteria for lobar intracerebral haemorrhage associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy: model development and diagnostic test accuracy study
Published in
Lancet Neurology, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30006-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark A Rodrigues, Neshika Samarasekera, Christine Lerpiniere, Catherine Humphreys, Mark O McCarron, Philip M White, James A R Nicoll, Cathie L M Sudlow, Charlotte Cordonnier, Joanna M Wardlaw, Colin Smith, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 197 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 24 12%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 10%
Other 45 23%
Unknown 42 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 42%
Neuroscience 29 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 55 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2023.
All research outputs
#248,559
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Neurology
#155
of 4,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,670
of 456,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Neurology
#2
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.