| Title |
Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-017-0700-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian D. Graham, Anita Kothari, Chris McCutcheon, On behalf of the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network Project Leads |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 22 | 21% |
| Australia | 12 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 11% |
| United States | 9 | 9% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 37 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 52% |
| Scientists | 39 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 426 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 17% |
| Researcher | 59 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 14% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Professor | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 81 | 19% |
| Unknown | 117 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 59 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 13% |
| Psychology | 14 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 77 | 18% |
| Unknown | 144 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#560,724
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#42
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,104
of 450,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.