↓ Skip to main content

Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet

Overview of attention for article published in Leukemia, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
430 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
Title
Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet
Published in
Leukemia, February 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41375-018-0077-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiziano Barbui, Ayalew Tefferi, Alessandro M. Vannucchi, Francesco Passamonti, Richard T. Silver, Ronald Hoffman, Srdan Verstovsek, Ruben Mesa, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Rȕdiger Hehlmann, Andreas Reiter, Francisco Cervantes, Claire Harrison, Mary Frances Mc Mullin, Hans Carl Hasselbalch, Steffen Koschmieder, Monia Marchetti, Andrea Bacigalupo, Guido Finazzi, Nicolaus Kroeger, Martin Griesshammer, Gunnar Birgegard, Giovanni Barosi

Abstract

This document updates the recommendations on the management of Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-neg MPNs) published in 2011 by the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consortium. Recommendations were produced by multiple-step formalized procedures of group discussion. A critical appraisal of evidence by using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was performed in the areas where at least one randomized clinical trial was published. Seven randomized controlled trials provided the evidence base; earlier phase trials also informed recommendation development. Key differences from the 2011 diagnostic recommendations included: lower threshold values for hemoglobin and hematocrit and bone marrow examination for diagnosis of polycythemia vera (PV), according to the revised WHO criteria; the search for complementary clonal markers, such as ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/IDH2, and SRSF2 for the diagnosis of myelofibrosis (MF) in patients who test negative for JAK2V617, CALR or MPL driver mutations. Regarding key differences of therapy recommendations, both recombinant interferon alpha and the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib are recommended as second-line therapies for PV patients who are intolerant or have inadequate response to hydroxyurea. Ruxolitinib is recommended as first-line approach for MF-associated splenomegaly in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk disease; in case of intermediate-1 disease, ruxolitinib is recommended in highly symptomatic splenomegaly. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is recommended for transplant-eligible MF patients with high or intermediate-2 risk score. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is also recommended for transplant-eligible MF patients with intermediate-1 risk score who present with either refractory, transfusion-dependent anemia, blasts in peripheral blood > 2%, adverse cytogenetics, or high-risk mutations. In these situations, the transplant procedure should be performed in a controlled setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 332 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 39 12%
Researcher 34 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 8%
Student > Master 26 8%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Other 66 20%
Unknown 114 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 125 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,850,690
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Leukemia
#1,947
of 5,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,484
of 333,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Leukemia
#36
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.