↓ Skip to main content

Standardizing biomarker testing for Canadian patients with advanced lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Current Oncology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Standardizing biomarker testing for Canadian patients with advanced lung cancer
Published in
Current Oncology, February 2018
DOI 10.3747/co.25.3867
Pubmed ID
Authors

B Melosky, N Blais, P Cheema, C Couture, R Juergens, S Kamel-Reid, M-S Tsao, P Wheatley-Price, Z Xu, D N Ionescu

Abstract

The development and approval of both targeted and immune therapies for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc) has significantly improved patient survival rates and quality of life. Biomarker testing for patients newly diagnosed with nsclc, as well as for patients progressing after treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, is the standard of care in Canada and many parts of the world. A group of thoracic oncology experts in the field of thoracic oncology met to describe the standard for biomarker testing for lung cancer in the Canadian context, focusing on evidence-based recommendations for standard-of-care testing for EGFR, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS1, BRAF V600 and programmed death-ligand (PD-L1) at the time of diagnosis of advanced disease and EGFR T790M upon progression. As well, additional exploratory molecules and targets are likely to impact future patient care, including MET exon 14 skipping mutations and whole gene amplification, RET translocations, HER2 (ERBB2) mutations, NTRK, RAS (KRAS and NRAS), as well as TP53. The standard of care must include the incorporation of testing for novel biomarkers as they become available, as it will be difficult for national guidelines to keep pace with technological advances in this area. Canadian patients with nsclc should be treated equally; the minimum standard of care is defined in this paper.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Other 7 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 28 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 29 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,837,642
of 25,396,120 outputs
Outputs from Current Oncology
#344
of 2,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,477
of 448,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Oncology
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,396,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.