↓ Skip to main content

Randomized trials and big data analysis: we need the best of both worlds

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Randomized trials and big data analysis: we need the best of both worlds
Published in
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, March 2018
DOI 10.1093/ejcts/ezy056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Treasure, Johanna J M Takkenberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 40%
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 50%
Unspecified 1 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Mathematics 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,365,355
of 25,578,098 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
#397
of 3,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,710
of 347,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
#14
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,578,098 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.