↓ Skip to main content

Predicting deterioration of ventricular function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot using machine learning

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Predicting deterioration of ventricular function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot using machine learning
Published in
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, March 2018
DOI 10.1093/ehjci/jey003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manar D Samad, Gregory J Wehner, Mohammad R Arbabshirani, Linyuan Jing, Andrew J Powell, Tal Geva, Christopher M Haggerty, Brandon K Fornwalt

Abstract

Previous studies using regression analyses have failed to identify which patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) are at risk for deterioration in ventricular size and function despite using common clinical and cardiac function parameters as well as cardiac mechanics (strain and dyssynchrony). This study used a machine learning pipeline to comprehensively investigate the predictive value of the baseline variables derived from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and provide models for identifying patients at risk for deterioration. Longitudinal deterioration for 153 patients with rTOF was categorized as 'none', 'minor', or 'major' based on changes in ventricular size and ejection fraction between two CMR scans at least 6 months apart (median 2.7 years). Baseline variables were measured at the time of the first CMR. An exhaustive variable search with a support vector machine classifier and five-fold cross-validation was used to predict deterioration and identify the most useful variables. For predicting any deterioration (minor or major) vs. no deterioration, the mean area under the curve (AUC) was 0.82 ± 0.06. For predicting major deterioration vs. minor or no deterioration, the AUC was 0.77 ± 0.07. Baseline left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, LV circumferential strain, and pulmonary regurgitation were most useful for achieving accurate predictions. For the prediction of deterioration in patients with rTOF, a machine learning pipeline uncovered the utility of baseline variables that was previously lost to regression analyses. The predictive models may be useful for planning early interventions in patients with high risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 40 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 34%
Computer Science 8 6%
Engineering 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 53 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,970,944
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,203
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,363
of 332,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
#27
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.