| Title |
Rethink public engagement for gene editing
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/d41586-018-03269-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Burall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 350 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 63 | 18% |
| United States | 58 | 17% |
| Spain | 12 | 3% |
| France | 9 | 3% |
| Australia | 9 | 3% |
| Germany | 8 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 7 | 2% |
| Italy | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 134 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 222 | 63% |
| Scientists | 91 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 25 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 24% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 275. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#131,391
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#8,588
of 98,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,171
of 348,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#207
of 914 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 914 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.