↓ Skip to main content

When Personal Feels Invasive: Foreseeing Challenges in Precision Medicine Communication

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Communication, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
When Personal Feels Invasive: Foreseeing Challenges in Precision Medicine Communication
Published in
Journal of Health Communication, December 2017
DOI 10.1080/10810730.2017.1417514
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chelsea L. Ratcliff, Kimberly A. Kaphingst, Jakob D. Jensen

Abstract

Precision medicine (PM) draws upon individual biological and psychosocial factors to create a personalized approach to healthcare. To date, little is known about how healthcare consumers will respond to such highly personalized guidance and treatment. The assumption is that responses will generally be favorable; yet in the media and in online public discussions about PM, concerns have been raised about invasions of privacy and autonomy. Findings from the tailoring literature-relevant because PM is, in a sense, "hypertailoring"-similarly suggest a potential for provoking unintended consequences such as personalization reactance, wherein perceived threat to one's privacy or freedom can lead to rejection of the personalized message or its source. Here, we review extant tailoring and other relevant research to identify challenges that could arise in PM communication. We then draw upon a patient-centered communication perspective to highlight elements of the communication process wherein resistance could be mitigated. This review aims to provide preliminary guidance for practitioners when communicating with patients and healthcare consumers about PM, as well as point scholars toward fruitful topics for research in this emerging health communication area.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 12%
Psychology 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Computer Science 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 13 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,495,664
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Communication
#539
of 1,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,944
of 441,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Communication
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.