↓ Skip to main content

Phen-Gen: combining phenotype and genotype to analyze rare disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Phen-Gen: combining phenotype and genotype to analyze rare disorders
Published in
Nature Methods, August 2014
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.3046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asif Javed, Saloni Agrawal, Pauline C Ng

Abstract

We introduce Phen-Gen, a method that combines patients' disease symptoms and sequencing data with prior domain knowledge to identify the causative genes for rare disorders. Simulations revealed that the causal variant was ranked first in 88% of cases when it was a coding variant-a 52% advantage over a genotype-only approach-and Phen-Gen outperformed other existing prediction methods by 13-58%. If disease etiology was unknown, the causal variant was assigned the top rank in 71% of simulations. Phen-Gen is available at http://phen-gen.org/.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
Brazil 4 2%
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 222 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 24%
Student > Master 28 11%
Other 15 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 32 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 20%
Computer Science 31 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 8%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 40 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,448,856
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,757
of 5,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,128
of 241,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#27
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.