↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness of the 21-Gene Breast Cancer Assay in Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of the 21-Gene Breast Cancer Assay in Mexico
Published in
Advances in Therapy, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12325-015-0190-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Enrique Bargalló-Rocha, Fernando Lara-Medina, Victor Pérez-Sánchez, Rafael Vázquez-Romo, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Hector Martínez-Said, Robin J. Shaw-Dulin, Alejandro Mohar-Betancourt, Barnaby Hunt, Juliette Plun-Favreau, William J. Valentine

Abstract

The 21-gene breast cancer assay (Oncotype DX(®); Genomic Health, Inc.) is a validated diagnostic test that predicts the likelihood of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit and 10-year risk of distant recurrence in patients with hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative, early-stage breast cancer. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using the assay to inform adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in Mexico.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,443,165
of 23,592,647 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#1,087
of 2,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,732
of 258,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,592,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.