↓ Skip to main content

A Statistical Approach for Rare-Variant Association Testing in Affected Sibships

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Statistical Approach for Rare-Variant Association Testing in Affected Sibships
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.01.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael P. Epstein, Richard Duncan, Erin B. Ware, Min A. Jhun, Lawrence F. Bielak, Wei Zhao, Jennifer A. Smith, Patricia A. Peyser, Sharon L.R. Kardia, Glen A. Satten

Abstract

Sequencing and exome-chip technologies have motivated development of novel statistical tests to identify rare genetic variation that influences complex diseases. Although many rare-variant association tests exist for case-control or cross-sectional studies, far fewer methods exist for testing association in families. This is unfortunate, because cosegregation of rare variation and disease status in families can amplify association signals for rare variants. Many researchers have begun sequencing (or genotyping via exome chips) familial samples that were either recently collected or previously collected for linkage studies. Because many linkage studies of complex diseases sampled affected sibships, we propose a strategy for association testing of rare variants for use in this study design. The logic behind our approach is that rare susceptibility variants should be found more often on regions shared identical by descent by affected sibling pairs than on regions not shared identical by descent. We propose both burden and variance-component tests of rare variation that are applicable to affected sibships of arbitrary size and that do not require genotype information from unaffected siblings or independent controls. Our approaches are robust to population stratification and produce analytic p values, thereby enabling our approach to scale easily to genome-wide studies of rare variation. We illustrate our methods by using simulated data and exome chip data from sibships ascertained for hypertension collected as part of the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy (GENOA) study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Professor 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,238,835
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#2,814
of 5,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,769
of 278,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#29
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.