| Title |
Understanding the Role of Human Variation in Vaccine Adverse Events: The Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatrics, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1542/peds.2010-1722j |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip S. LaRussa, Kathryn M. Edwards, Cornelia L. Dekker, Nicola P. Klein, Neal A. Halsey, Colin Marchant, Roger Baxter, Renata J. M. Engler, Jennifer Kissner, Barbara A. Slade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Librarian | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 25% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,360,839
of 25,391,066 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#8,688
of 18,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,233
of 120,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#72
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.