↓ Skip to main content

SoloDel: a probabilistic model for detecting low-frequent somatic deletions from unmatched sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
SoloDel: a probabilistic model for detecting low-frequent somatic deletions from unmatched sequencing data
Published in
Bioinformatics, June 2015
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv358
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junho Kim, Sanghyeon Kim, Hojung Nam, Sangwoo Kim, Doheon Lee

Abstract

Finding somatic mutations from massively parallel sequencing data is becoming a standard process in genome-based biomedical studies. There are a number of robust methods developed for detecting somatic single nucleotide variations (SNVs). However, detection of somatic copy number alteration (SCNAs) has been substantially less explored and remains vulnerable to frequently raised sampling issues: low frequency in cell population and absence of the matched control samples. We developed a novel computational method SoloDel that accurately classifies low-frequent somatic deletions from germline ones with or without matched control samples. We first constructed a probabilistic, somatic mutation progression model that describes the occurrence and propagation of the event in the cellular lineage of the sample. We then built a Gaussian mixture model to represent the mixed population of somatic and germline deletions. Parameters of the mixture model could be estimated using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm with the observed distribution of read-depth ratios at the points of discordant-read based initial deletion calls. Combined with conventional structural variation caller, SoloDel greatly increased the accuracy in classifying somatic mutations. Even without control, SoloDel maintained a comparable performance in a wide range of mutated subpopulation size (10% to 70%). SoloDel could also successfully recall experimentally validated somatic deletions from previously reported neuropsychiatric whole genome sequencing data. Java-based implementation of the method is available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/solodel/ CONTACT: [email protected].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
France 1 4%
Korea, Republic of 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 24 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 25%
Computer Science 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,779,140
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#6,331
of 12,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,434
of 280,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#124
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.