| Title |
International consensus statements on early chronic Pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with The International Association of Pancreatology, American Pancreatic Association, Japan Pancreas Society, PancreasFest Working Group and European Pancreatic Club
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pancreatology, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pan.2018.05.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David C. Whitcomb, Tooru Shimosegawa, Suresh T. Chari, Christopher E. Forsmark, Luca Frulloni, Pramod Garg, Peter Hegyi, Yoshiki Hirooka, Atsushi Irisawa, Takuya Ishikawa, Shuiji Isaji, Markus M. Lerch, Philippe Levy, Atsushi Masamune, Charles M. Wilcox, John Windsor, Dhiraj Yadav, Andrea Sheel, John P. Neoptolemos, for the Working Group for the International Consensus Guidelines for Chronic Pancreatitis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 39 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,217,039
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Pancreatology
#161
of 1,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,246
of 347,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pancreatology
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.