↓ Skip to main content

Recent updates and challenges on the regulation of precision medicine: The United States in perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Recent updates and challenges on the regulation of precision medicine: The United States in perspective
Published in
Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.04.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin-Chau Chang, Thomas E. Colonna

Abstract

The rapid progress in "omics", such as genomics, metabolomics, microbiomics, has paved the path for precision medicine and revolutionized the development of drugs and devices promising to meet unmet medical needs. The aim of the present study was to investigate the current regulatory framework established by the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) and to identify challenges and concerns through study of related literatures in the PubMed database. We found that efforts were made to facilitate the implementation of precision medicine through organizational reform, publication of guidance documents, and continuous post-market surveillance. The challenges identified included the critical, fundamental structural requirements of databases, essential regulatory considerations for market approval, and the appropriate clinical use such as whole genomic sequencing tests especially for a newborn or even fetus. These issues are worth further research to devise an integral approach involving scientific, ethical, legal, and social considerations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Other 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 22 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 18 27%
Unknown 23 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP
#2,007
of 2,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,329
of 338,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP
#30
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.