↓ Skip to main content

GeneVetter: a web tool for quantitative monogenic assessment of rare diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
GeneVetter: a web tool for quantitative monogenic assessment of rare diseases
Published in
Bioinformatics, July 2015
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv432
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher E Gillies, Catherine C Robertson, Matthew G Sampson, Hyun Min Kang

Abstract

When performing DNA sequencing to diagnose affected individuals with monogenic forms of rare diseases, accurate attribution of causality to detected variants is imperative but imperfect. Even if a gene has variants already known to cause a disease, rare disruptive variants predicted to be causal are not always so, mainly due to imperfect ability to predict the pathogenicity of variants. Existing population-scale sequence resources such as 1000 Genomes are useful to quantify the "background prevalence" of an unaffected individual being falsely predicted to carry causal variants. We developed GeneVetter to allow users to quantify the "background prevalence" of subjects with predicted causal variants within specific genes under user-specified filtering parameters. GeneVetter helps quantify uncertainty in monogenic diagnosis and design genetic studies with support for power and sample size calculations for specific genes with specific filtering criteria. GeneVetter also allows users to analyze their own sequence data without sending genotype information over the Internet. Overall, GeneVetter is an interactive web tool that facilitates quantifying and accounting for the background prevalence of predicted pathogenic variants in a population. GeneVetter is available at http://genevetter.org/ CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary text is available at Bioinformatics online.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Computer Science 3 11%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,296,986
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#1,610
of 12,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,715
of 275,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#56
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.