↓ Skip to main content

Role of Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in the Etiological Work-Up of Congenitally Deaf Children

Overview of attention for article published in Otology & Neurotology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Role of Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in the Etiological Work-Up of Congenitally Deaf Children
Published in
Otology & Neurotology, July 2018
DOI 10.1097/mao.0000000000001847
Pubmed ID
Authors

An Boudewyns, Jenneke van den Ende, Manou Sommen, Wim Wuyts, Nils Peeters, Paul Van de Heyning, Guy Van Camp

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to report the results of a comprehensive etiological work-up for congenitally deaf children including targeted next generation sequencing. Retrospective case review. Tertiary referral center. Fifty children with congenital, bilateral profound hearing loss (HL) (>90 dBnHL). Etiological work-up included testing for pathogenic variants in GJB2, a phenotype driven genetic analysis, screening for congenital infections and imaging. When no etiology could be found, comprehensive genetic testing was performed using a HL gene panel including 45 syndromic and 96 non-syndromic HL genes. Eleven patients carried bi-allelic pathogenic variants in GJB2. Phenotype driven genetic analysis identified two homozygous KCNQ1 patients (Jervell and Lange Nielsen syndrome) and one heterozygous CHD7 patient (CHARGE syndrome). One patient was diagnosed with achondroplasia and one had a clinical diagnosis of Waardenburg syndrome. A deafness gene panel evaluated 16 patients. In 12 out of 16, we identified a pathogenic (n = 12) or likely pathogenic (n = 2) variant and one variant of unknown significance (VUS). A definite diagnosis of non-syndromic or syndromic HL was made in 18 and seven patients, respectively. Non-genetic causes were congenital cytomegalovirus infection (n = 11), anatomic abnormalities (n = 2), neurological/metabolic/polymalformative conditions (n = 3), meningitis (n = 1), and auditory neuropathy (n = 1). A definite genetic cause was found in 25 (50%) of congenital, bilaterally deaf children. Our data show that implementation of a gene panel improves the diagnostic yield for etiological work-up of congenital profound HL to 86%. Identification of the etiology of congenital HL may contribute to predicting outcomes of cochlear implantation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Mathematics 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 16 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,551,172
of 23,351,247 outputs
Outputs from Otology & Neurotology
#326
of 3,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,546
of 328,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Otology & Neurotology
#7
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,351,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,764 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.