| Title |
Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher K Bichakjian, Thomas Olencki, Sumaira Z Aasi, Murad Alam, James S Andersen, Rachel Blitzblau, Glen M Bowen, Carlo M Contreras, Gregory A Daniels, Roy Decker, Jeffrey M Farma, Kris Fisher, Brian Gastman, Karthik Ghosh, Roy C Grekin, Kenneth Grossman, Alan L Ho, Karl D Lewis, Manisha Loss, Daniel D Lydiatt, Jane Messina, Kishwer S Nehal, Paul Nghiem, Igor Puzanov, Chrysalyne D Schmults, Ashok R Shaha, Valencia Thomas, Yaohui G Xu, John A Zic, Karin G Hoffmann, Anita M Engh |
| Abstract |
This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) focuses on areas impacted by recently emerging data, including sections describing MCC risk factors, diagnosis, workup, follow-up, and management of advanced disease with radiation and systemic therapy. Included in these sections are discussion of the new recommendations for use of Merkel cell polyomavirus as a biomarker and new recommendations for use of checkpoint immunotherapies to treat metastatic or unresectable disease. The next update of the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for MCC will include more detailed information about elements of pathology and addresses additional aspects of management of MCC, including surgical management of the primary tumor and draining nodal basin, radiation therapy as primary treatment, and management of recurrence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,427,547
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#196
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,809
of 345,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#6
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.