↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations on prevention and screening for breast cancer in Hong Kong.

Overview of attention for article published in Hong Kong Medical Journal, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 436)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Recommendations on prevention and screening for breast cancer in Hong Kong.
Published in
Hong Kong Medical Journal, June 2018
DOI 10.12809/hkmj177037
Pubmed ID
Authors

T H Lam, K H Wong, K Kl Chan, M Cm Chan, D Vk Chao, A Ny Cheung, C Ym Fan, J Ho, E P Hui, K O Lam, C K Law, W L Law, H Hf Loong, R Kc Ngan, T Hf Tsang, M Cs Wong, R Mw Yeung, A Ch Ying, R Ching

Abstract

In Hong Kong, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and poses a significant health care burden. The Cancer Expert Working Group on Cancer Prevention and Screening (CEWG) was set up in 2002 by the Cancer Coordinating Committee to review and assess local and international scientific evidence, and to formulate recommendations for cancer prevention and screening. After considering the local epidemiology, emerging scientific evidence, and local and overseas screening practices, the CEWG concluded that it was unclear whether population-based breast cancer screening did more harm than good in local asymptomatic women at average risk. The CEWG considers that there is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against population-based mammography screening for such individuals. Women who consider breast cancer screening should be adequately informed about the benefits and harms. The CEWG recommends that all women adopt primary preventive measures, be breast aware, and seek timely medical attention for suspicious symptoms. For women at high risk of breast cancer, such as carriers of confirmed BRCA1/2 deleterious mutations and those with a family history of breast cancer, the CEWG recommends that they seek doctor's advice for annual mammography screening and the age at which the process should commence. Additional annual screening by magnetic resonance imaging is recommended for confirmed BRCA1/2 mutation carriers or women who have undergone radiation therapy to the chest between the age of 10 and 30 years. Women at moderate risk of breast cancer should discuss with doctors the pros and cons of breast cancer screening before making an informed decision about mammography screening every 2 to 3 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 21 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 23 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,761,243
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Hong Kong Medical Journal
#17
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,764
of 341,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hong Kong Medical Journal
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them