↓ Skip to main content

Systemic Therapy for Stage IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
65 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
469 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
Title
Systemic Therapy for Stage IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, August 2015
DOI 10.1200/jco.2015.62.1342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory A Masters, Sarah Temin, Christopher G Azzoli, Giuseppe Giaccone, Sherman Baker, Julie R Brahmer, Peter M Ellis, Ajeet Gajra, Nancy Rackear, Joan H Schiller, Thomas J Smith, John R Strawn, David Trent, David H Johnson

Abstract

To provide evidence-based recommendations to update the American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on systemic therapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An Update Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology NSCLC Expert Panel based recommendations on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials from January 2007 to February 2014. This guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous guideline. There is no cure for patients with stage IV NSCLC. For patients with performance status (PS) 0 to 1 (and appropriate patient cases with PS 2) and without an EGFR-sensitizing mutation or ALK gene rearrangement, combination cytotoxic chemotherapy is recommended, guided by histology, with early concurrent palliative care. Recommendations for patients in the first-line setting include platinum-doublet therapy for those with PS 0 to 1 (bevacizumab may be added to carboplatin plus paclitaxel if no contraindications); combination or single-agent chemotherapy or palliative care alone for those with PS 2; afatinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib for those with sensitizing EGFR mutations; crizotinib for those with ALK or ROS1 gene rearrangement; and following first-line recommendations or using platinum plus etoposide for those with large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Maintenance therapy includes pemetrexed continuation for patients with stable disease or response to first-line pemetrexed-containing regimens, alternative chemotherapy, or a chemotherapy break. In the second-line setting, recommendations include docetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib, or pemetrexed for patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma; docetaxel, erlotinib, or gefitinib for those with squamous cell carcinoma; and chemotherapy or ceritinib for those with ALK rearrangement who experience progression after crizotinib. In the third-line setting, for patients who have not received erlotinib or gefitinib, treatment with erlotinib is recommended. There are insufficient data to recommend routine third-line cytotoxic therapy. Decisions regarding systemic therapy should not be made based on age alone. Additional information can be found at http://www.asco.org/guidelines/nsclc and http://www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 367 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 53 14%
Researcher 50 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 12%
Student > Master 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Other 73 20%
Unknown 79 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 2%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 95 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#548,696
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#1,161
of 22,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,028
of 277,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#24
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.