↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of machine learning algorithms performance for the prediction of early multiple sclerosis from resting-state FMRI connectivity data

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of machine learning algorithms performance for the prediction of early multiple sclerosis from resting-state FMRI connectivity data
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11682-018-9926-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valeria Saccà, Alessia Sarica, Fabiana Novellino, Stefania Barone, Tiziana Tallarico, Enrica Filippelli, Alfredo Granata, Carmelina Chiriaco, Roberto Bruno Bossio, Paola Valentino, Aldo Quattrone

Abstract

Machine Learning application on clinical data in order to support diagnosis and prognostic evaluation arouses growing interest in scientific community. However, choice of right algorithm to use was fundamental to perform reliable and robust classification. Our study aimed to explore if different kinds of Machine Learning technique could be effective to support early diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and which of them presented best performance in distinguishing Multiple Sclerosis patients from control subjects. We selected following algorithms: Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Naïve-Bayes, K-nearest-neighbor and Artificial Neural Network. We applied the Independent Component Analysis to resting-state functional-MRI sequence to identify brain networks. We found 15 networks, from which we extracted the mean signals used into classification. We performed feature selection tasks in all algorithms to obtain the most important variables. We showed that best discriminant network between controls and early Multiple Sclerosis, was the sensori-motor I, according to early manifestation of motor/sensorial deficits in Multiple Sclerosis. Moreover, in classification performance, Random Forest and Support Vector Machine showed same 5-fold cross-validation accuracies (85.7%) using only this network, resulting to be best approaches. We believe that these findings could represent encouraging step toward the translation to clinical diagnosis and prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 126 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 44 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 14 11%
Computer Science 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Engineering 9 7%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 60 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,385,033
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#477
of 1,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,975
of 326,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.