↓ Skip to main content

What People Want to Know About Their Genes: A Critical Review of the Literature on Large-Scale Genome Sequencing Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Healthcare, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
What People Want to Know About Their Genes: A Critical Review of the Literature on Large-Scale Genome Sequencing Studies
Published in
Healthcare, August 2018
DOI 10.3390/healthcare6030096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Courtney L. Scherr, Sharon Aufox, Amy A. Ross, Sanjana Ramesh, Catherine A. Wicklund, Maureen Smith

Abstract

From a public health perspective, the "All of Us" study provides an opportunity to isolate targeted and cost-effective prevention and early-detection strategies. Identifying motivations for participation in large-scale genomic sequencing (LSGS) studies, and motivations and preferences to receive results will help determine effective strategies for "All of Us" study implementation. This paper offers a critical review of the literature regarding LSGS for adult onset hereditary conditions where results could indicate an increased risk to develop disease. The purpose of this review is to synthesize studies which explored peoples' motivations for participating in LSGS studies, and their desire to receive different types of genetic results. Participants were primarily motivated by altruism, desire to know more about their health, and curiosity. When asked about hypothetically receiving results, most participants in hypothetical studies wanted all results except those which were uncertain (i.e., a variant of uncertain significance (VUS)). However, participants in studies where results were returned preferred to receive only results for which an intervention was available, but also wanted VUS. Concerns about peoples' understanding of results and possible psychosocial implications are noted. Most studies examined populations classified as "early adopters," therefore, additional research on motivations and expectations among the general public, minority, and underserved populations is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,936,216
of 24,787,209 outputs
Outputs from Healthcare
#963
of 3,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,237
of 336,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Healthcare
#17
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,787,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.