↓ Skip to main content

Alternative splicing expands the prognostic impact of KRAS in microsatellite stable primary colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cancer, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Alternative splicing expands the prognostic impact of KRAS in microsatellite stable primary colorectal cancer
Published in
International Journal of Cancer, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/ijc.31809
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ina A. Eilertsen, Anita Sveen, Jonas M. Strømme, Rolf I. Skotheim, Arild Nesbakken, Ragnhild A. Lothe

Abstract

KRAS mutation is a well-known marker for poor response to targeted treatment and patient prognosis in microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC). However, variation in clinical outcomes among patients wild-type for KRAS underlines that this is not a homogeneous population. Here, we evaluated the prognostic impact of KRAS alternative splicing in relation to mutation status in a single-hospital series of primary MSS CRCs (N = 258). Using splicing-sensitive microarrays and RNA sequencing, the relative expression of KRAS-4A versus KRAS-4B transcript variants was confirmed to be down-regulated in CRC compared to normal colonic mucosa (N = 41; P ≤ 0.001). This was independent of mutation status, however, gene set enrichment analysis revealed that the effect of splicing on KRAS signaling was specific to the KRAS wild-type subgroup, in which low relative KRAS-4A expression was associated with a higher level of KRAS signaling (P = 0.005). In concordance, the prognostic value of KRAS splicing was also dependent on mutation status, and for patients with stage I-III KRAS wild-type MSS CRC, low relative KRAS-4A expression was associated with inferior overall survival (HR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.07-5.18, P = 0.033), a result not found in mutant cases (Pinteraction = 0.026). The prognostic association in the wild-type subgroup was independent of clinicopathological factors, including cancer stage in multivariable analysis (HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.18-6.09, P = 0.018). This suggests that KRAS has prognostic value beyond mutation status in MSS CRC, and highlights the importance of molecular heterogeneity in the clinically relevant KRAS wild-type subgroup. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Psychology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,419,628
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#9,669
of 12,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,721
of 355,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#108
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.