↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for diagnostic next-generation sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Human Genetics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
32 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
414 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
819 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Guidelines for diagnostic next-generation sequencing
Published in
European Journal of Human Genetics, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2015.226
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gert Matthijs, Erika Souche, Mariëlle Alders, Anniek Corveleyn, Sebastian Eck, Ilse Feenstra, Valérie Race, Erik Sistermans, Marc Sturm, Marjan Weiss, Helger Yntema, Egbert Bakker, Hans Scheffer, Peter Bauer

Abstract

We present, on behalf of EuroGentest and the European Society of Human Genetics, guidelines for the evaluation and validation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) applications for the diagnosis of genetic disorders. The work was performed by a group of laboratory geneticists and bioinformaticians, and discussed with clinical geneticists, industry and patients' representatives, and other stakeholders in the field of human genetics. The statements that were written during the elaboration of the guidelines are presented here. The background document and full guidelines are available as supplementary material. They include many examples to assist the laboratories in the implementation of NGS and accreditation of this service. The work and ideas presented by others in guidelines that have emerged elsewhere in the course of the past few years were also considered and are acknowledged in the full text. Interestingly, a few new insights that have not been cited before have emerged during the preparation of the guidelines. The most important new feature is the presentation of a 'rating system' for NGS-based diagnostic tests. The guidelines and statements have been applauded by the genetic diagnostic community, and thus seem to be valuable for the harmonization and quality assurance of NGS diagnostics in Europe.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 28 October 2015; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.226.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 819 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 793 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 168 21%
Other 96 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 12%
Student > Master 93 11%
Student > Bachelor 73 9%
Other 113 14%
Unknown 180 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 239 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 145 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 130 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 2%
Computer Science 18 2%
Other 66 8%
Unknown 202 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,118,169
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#142
of 3,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,590
of 297,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#4
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.