| Title |
The Future of Public Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmsa1511248 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas R Frieden |
| Abstract |
Though there has sometimes been distrust between the health care and public health fields, they are inevitably and increasingly interdependent. And improvements in some types of public health interventions can increase the impact of clinical care on population health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 672 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 165 | 25% |
| Spain | 50 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 47 | 7% |
| Canada | 23 | 3% |
| Australia | 21 | 3% |
| Brazil | 11 | 2% |
| Colombia | 10 | 1% |
| Mexico | 10 | 1% |
| Argentina | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 83 | 12% |
| Unknown | 247 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 406 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 148 | 22% |
| Scientists | 107 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 294 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 22% |
| Researcher | 54 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 12% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 83 | 27% |
| Unknown | 9 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 141 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 65 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 522. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#49,188
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,648
of 32,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#532
of 296,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#21
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.