Title |
What works in genomics education: outcomes of an evidenced-based instructional model for community-based physicians
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1038/gim.2015.144 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
E. Kate Reed, Katherine A. Johansen Taber, Therese Ingram Nissen, Suzanna Schott, Lynn O. Dowling, James C. O'Leary, Joan A. Scott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 36% |
Italy | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 58 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Researcher | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 22% |
Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,855,051
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,215
of 2,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,950
of 395,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#16
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.