↓ Skip to main content

An optimized prediction framework to assess the functional impact of pharmacogenetic variants

Overview of attention for article published in The Pharmacogenomics Journal, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
An optimized prediction framework to assess the functional impact of pharmacogenetic variants
Published in
The Pharmacogenomics Journal, September 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41397-018-0044-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yitian Zhou, Souren Mkrtchian, Masaki Kumondai, Masahiro Hiratsuka, Volker M. Lauschke

Abstract

Prediction of phenotypic consequences of mutations constitutes an important aspect of precision medicine. Current computational tools mostly rely on evolutionary conservation and have been calibrated on variants associated with disease, which poses conceptual problems for assessment of variants in poorly conserved pharmacogenes. Here, we evaluated the performance of 18 current functionality prediction methods leveraging experimental high-quality activity data from 337 variants in genes involved in drug metabolism and transport and found that these models only achieved probabilities of 0.1-50.6% to make informed conclusions. We therefore developed a functionality prediction framework optimized for pharmacogenetic assessments that significantly outperformed current algorithms. Our model achieved 93% for both sensitivity and specificity for both loss-of-function and functionally neutral variants, and we confirmed its superior performance using cross validation analyses. This novel model holds promise to improve the translation of personal genetic information into biological conclusions and pharmacogenetic recommendations, thereby facilitating the implementation of Next-Generation Sequencing data into clinical diagnostics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 32 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 42 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,673,825
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from The Pharmacogenomics Journal
#288
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,679
of 340,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Pharmacogenomics Journal
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.