↓ Skip to main content

PRESM: personalized reference editor for somatic mutation discovery in cancer genomics

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
PRESM: personalized reference editor for somatic mutation discovery in cancer genomics
Published in
Bioinformatics, September 2018
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty812
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chen Cao, Lauren Mak, Guangxu Jin, Paul Gordon, Kai Ye, Quan Long

Abstract

Accurate detection of somatic mutations is a crucial step towards understanding cancer. Various tools have been developed to detect somatic mutations from cancer genome sequencing data by mapping reads to a universal reference genome and inferring likelihoods from complex statistical models. However, read mapping is frequently obstructed by mismatches between germline and somatic mutations on a read and the reference genome. Previous attempts to develop personalized genome tools are not compatible with downstream statistical models for somatic mutation detection. We present PRESM, a tool that builds personalized reference genomes by integrating germline mutations into the reference genome. The aforementioned obstacle is circumvented by using a two-step germline substitution procedure, maintaining positional fidelity using an innovative workaround. Reads derived from tumor tissue can be positioned more accurately along a personalized reference than a universal reference due to the reduced genetic distance between the subject (tumor genome) and the target (the personalized genome). Application of PRESM's personalized genome reduced false-positive somatic mutation calls by as much as 55.5%, and facilitated the discovery of a novel somatic point mutation on a germline insertion in PDE1A, a phosphodiesterase associated with melanoma. Moreover, all improvements in calling accuracy were achieved without parameter optimization, as PRESM itself is parameter-free. Hence, similar increases in read mapping and decreases in the false positive rate will persist when PRESM-built genomes are applied to any user-provided dataset. The software is available at https://github.com/precisionomics/PRESM. Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Other 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 41%
Computer Science 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,329,366
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#7,241
of 9,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,468
of 342,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#168
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.