| Title |
Genetic Tools for Coronary Risk Assessment in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study From the ACCORD Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetes Care, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2337/dc18-0709 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mario Luca Morieri, He Gao, Marie Pigeyre, Hetal S. Shah, Jennifer Sjaarda, Christine Mendonca, Timothy Hastings, Patinut Buranasupkajorn, Alison A. Motsinger-Reif, Daniel M. Rotroff, Ronald J. Sigal, Santica M. Marcovina, Peter Kraft, John B. Buse, Michael J. Wagner, Hertzel C. Gerstein, Josyf C. Mychaleckyj, Guillaume Parè, Alessandro Doria |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 21% |
| Spain | 5 | 21% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 54% |
| Scientists | 5 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 48 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,170,111
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Care
#1,538
of 10,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,698
of 355,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Care
#27
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.