↓ Skip to main content

Genetic risk score (GRS) constructed from polymorphisms in the PON1, IL-6, ITGB3, and ALDH2 genes is associated with the risk of coronary artery disease in Pakistani subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids in Health and Disease, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Genetic risk score (GRS) constructed from polymorphisms in the PON1, IL-6, ITGB3, and ALDH2 genes is associated with the risk of coronary artery disease in Pakistani subjects
Published in
Lipids in Health and Disease, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12944-018-0874-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

NA Shabana, Sana Ashiq, Anam Ijaz, Fizah Khalid, Istabsar ul Saadat, Kahkashan Khan, Sumbal Sarwar, Saleem Ullah Shahid

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major killer in today's world. Pakistan is also affected by this non-communicable disease like other countries. It is a multifactorial disease and is influenced by many gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. A total of 623 (219 controls, 404 cases) Pakistani subjects were genotyped for four SNPs, rs662 (PON1), rs5918 (ITGB3), rs671 (ALDH2), rs1800795 (IL-6) by PCR-RFLP. Various anthropometric parameters were noted and serum lipid profile was measured using commercially available kits. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS version 22. A Genetic Risk Score (GRS) was calculated from individual SNPs. The association of the SNPs and the GRS with CAD was checked using logistic regression. The results showed that the risk allele frequencies of all variants were higher in the cases than the controls, however the difference was not statistically significant association (p > 0.0125). The mean GRS in the controls was 3.99 ± 1.42 and in cases, it was 4.29 ± 1.39, the difference between the groups was significant (p = 0.0109). logistic regression of individual SNPs and GRS with the CAD showed that independent SNPs were not significantly associated with the CAD however, the GRS had a strong association (p = 1.4 × 10- 4). The subjects were divided into three groups based on GRS (Gp 1 with GRS 0-2, Gp 2 with GRS 3-5 and Gp 3 with GRS 6-8). The analysis of the effect of the individual SNPs and GRS groups on different lipid profile parameters revealed no significant association of any of the tested SNPs with any lipid parameter, however, the GRS groups showed marginally significant for TC and highly significant association for TG, LDL-c and HDL-c. In conclusion, use of a GRS can provide better information than individual SNPs. The larger the number of the SNPs included in the analysis, the better would be the risk prediction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Computer Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,629,406
of 24,032,151 outputs
Outputs from Lipids in Health and Disease
#778
of 1,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,650
of 345,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids in Health and Disease
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,032,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.