| Title |
The ClinGen Epilepsy Gene Curation Expert Panel—Bridging the divide between clinical domain knowledge and formal gene curation criteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Mutation, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/humu.23632 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingo Helbig, Erin Rooney Riggs, Carrie‐Anne Barry, Karl Martin Klein, David Dyment, Courtney Thaxton, Bekim Sadikovic, Tristan T. Sands, Jacy L. Wagnon, Khalida Liaquat, Maria Roberta Cilio, Ghayda Mirzaa, Kristen Park, Erika Axeen, Elizabeth Butler, Tanya M. Bardakjian, Pasquale Striano, Annapurna Poduri, Rebecca K. Siegert, Andrew R. Grant, Katherine L. Helbig, Heather C. Mefford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 39% |
| Germany | 2 | 9% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 8 | 35% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,003,926
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Human Mutation
#104
of 2,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,924
of 346,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Mutation
#7
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,923 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.