| Title |
Genetic Basis for Congenital Heart Disease: Revisited: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1161/cir.0000000000000606 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Ella Pierpont, Martina Brueckner, Wendy K. Chung, Vidu Garg, Ronald V. Lacro, Amy L. McGuire, Seema Mital, James R. Priest, William T. Pu, Amy Roberts, Stephanie M. Ware, Bruce D. Gelb, Mark W. Russell, On behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 31% |
| Spain | 11 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Colombia | 3 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 17% |
| Scientists | 11 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 490 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 490 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 10% |
| Researcher | 42 | 9% |
| Other | 39 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 8% |
| Other | 74 | 15% |
| Unknown | 199 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 71 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 33 | 7% |
| Unknown | 222 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#835,292
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#2,108
of 21,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,520
of 451,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#49
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.