↓ Skip to main content

Health care expenditures for Medicaid‐covered males with haemophilia in the United States, 2008

Overview of attention for article published in Haemophilia, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Health care expenditures for Medicaid‐covered males with haemophilia in the United States, 2008
Published in
Haemophilia, December 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02713.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. GUH, S. D. GROSSE, S. McALISTER, C. M. KESSLER, J. M. SOUCIE

Abstract

Although haemophilia is an expensive disorder, no studies have estimated health care costs for Americans with haemophilia enrolled in Medicaid as distinct from those with employer-sponsored insurance (ESI). The objective of this study is to provide information on health care utilization and expenditures for publicly insured people with haemophilia in the United States in comparison with people with haemophilia who have ESI. Data from the MarketScan Medicaid Multi-State, Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases were used for the period 2004-2008 to identify cases of haemophilia and to estimate medical expenditures during 2008. A total of 511 Medicaid-enrolled males with haemophilia were identified, 435 of whom were enrolled in Medicaid for at least 11 months during 2008. Most people with haemophilia qualified for Medicaid based on 'disability'. Average Medicaid expenditures in 2008 were $142,987 [median, $46,737], similar to findings for people with ESI. Average costs for males with haemophilia A and an inhibitor were 3.6 times higher than those for individuals without an inhibitor. Average costs for 56 adult Medicaid enrollees with HCV or HIV infection were not statistically different from those for adults without the infection, but median costs were 1.6 times higher for those treated for blood-borne infections. Haemophilia treatment can lead to high costs for payers. Further research is needed to understand the effects of public health insurance on haemophilia care and expenditures, to evaluate treatment strategies and to implement strategies that may improve outcomes and reduce costs of care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 28%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2012.
All research outputs
#15,593,749
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Haemophilia
#1,253
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,739
of 252,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Haemophilia
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.