↓ Skip to main content

Selecting Patients with Ovarian Cancer for Germline BRCA Mutation Testing: Findings from Guidelines and a Systematic Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Selecting Patients with Ovarian Cancer for Germline BRCA Mutation Testing: Findings from Guidelines and a Systematic Literature Review
Published in
Advances in Therapy, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12325-016-0281-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana M. Eccles, Judith Balmaña, Joe Clune, Birgit Ehlken, Annegret Gohlke, Ceri Hirst, Danielle Potter, Claudia Schroeder, Jerzy E. Tyczynski, Encarnacion B. Gomez Garcia

Abstract

One of the most significant risk factors for the development of ovarian cancer (OC) is a genetic mutation in BRCA1 (breast cancer gene 1) or BRCA2. Here we describe the impact of previous and current guidance on BRCA testing practices and provide evidence about which characteristics best identify patients with OC and an underlying germline BRCA mutation. A search was conducted for guidelines recommending genetic testing to identify constitutional pathogenic mutations in the BRCA genes. In addition, a systematic literature search of studies published in 2003-2015 was performed to assess BRCA mutation frequency in population-based OC patients unselected for patient characteristics (personal history, family history, and Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity) and to describe the association of patient characteristics with BRCA mutation. Exclusively, studies assessing epithelial OC or invasive epithelial OC with full-gene screening of both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were evaluated. Of 15 guidelines recommending genetic testing for OC patients, only 5 do not require co-occurrence of specific patient or family characteristics. Twenty-two full publications were identified that assessed germline BRCA mutation frequency in women with OC, utilizing a range of different full mutation detection methods. Germline BRCA mutation prevalence in patients with OC was 5.8-24.8%. Using criteria recommended in guidelines that are yet to be updated, we estimated that 27.5% of all germline BRCA mutations present in patients with OC may be missed because patients do not meet appropriate criteria. With the availability of BRCA mutation-targeted therapies, identification of patients with OC with germline BRCA mutations has potential therapeutic consequences. For identified gene carriers, predictive testing to allow cancer prevention strategies, including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, provides wider benefit to identifying such gene carriers. Updating guidelines will increase the opportunity for targeted treatment among patients and risk reduction in relatives. AstraZeneca.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Professor 6 8%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,220,363
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#924
of 2,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,111
of 396,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#12
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.