| Title |
BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutations and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djy148 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mok Oh, Ali McBride, Seongseok Yun, Sandipan Bhattacharjee, Marion Slack, Jennifer R Martin, Joanne Jeter, Ivo Abraham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Italy | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 16% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 23% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 44 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,629,124
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#1,052
of 7,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,727
of 363,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#15
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.