↓ Skip to main content

Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: state of the art on clinical practice guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in RMD Open, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: state of the art on clinical practice guidelines
Published in
RMD Open, October 2018
DOI 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Sulli, Rosaria Talarico, Carlo Alberto Scirè, Tadej Avcin, Marco Castori, Alessandro Ferraris, Charissa Frank, Jürgen Grunert, Sabrina Paolino, Stefano Bombardieri, Matthias Schneider, Vanessa Smith, Maurizio Cutolo, Marta Mosca, Fransiska Malfait

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Other 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Psychology 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,557,033
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from RMD Open
#380
of 1,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,001
of 356,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RMD Open
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.