| Title |
Systemic sclerosis: state of the art on clinical practice guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
RMD Open, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000782 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa Smith, Carlo Alberto Scirè, Rosaria Talarico, Paolo Airo, Tobias Alexander, Yannick Allanore, Cosimo Bruni, Veronica Codullo, Virgil Dalm, Jeska De Vries-Bouwstra, Alessandra Della Rossa, Oliver Distler, Ilaria Galetti, David Launay, Gemma Lepri, Alexis Mathian, Luc Mouthon, Barbara Ruaro, Alberto Sulli, Angela Tincani, Els Vandecasteele, Amber Vanhaecke, Marie Vanthuyne, Frank Van den Hoogen, Ronald Van Vollenhoven, Alexandre E Voskuyl, Elisabetta Zanatta, Stefano Bombardieri, Gerd Burmester, João Eurico Fonseca, Charissa Frank, Eric Hachulla, Frederic Houssiau, Ulf Mueller-Ladner, Matthias Schneider, Jacob M van Laar, Ana Vieira, Maurizio Cutolo, Marta Mosca, Marco Matucci-Cerinic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| South Africa | 1 | 10% |
| Portugal | 1 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 186 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 62 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 37% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 69 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,820,776
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from RMD Open
#310
of 849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,513
of 349,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RMD Open
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.