| Title |
Next-Generation Service Delivery: A Scoping Review of Patient Outcomes Associated with Alternative Models of Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancers, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3390/cancers10110435 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeanna M. McCuaig, Susan Randall Armel, Melanie Care, Alexandra Volenik, Raymond H. Kim, Kelly A. Metcalfe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 17% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2020.
All research outputs
#13,949,161
of 24,323,543 outputs
Outputs from Cancers
#4,770
of 14,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,668
of 347,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancers
#43
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,323,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.