↓ Skip to main content

Improving Emergency Department-Based Care of Sickle Cell Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Hematology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Improving Emergency Department-Based Care of Sickle Cell Pain
Published in
Hematology, December 2017
DOI 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.412
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey A. Glassberg

Abstract

Pain is the leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits for individuals living with sickle cell disease (SCD). The care that is delivered in the ED is often cited by patients with SCD as the area of health care in greatest need of improvement. In 2014, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute released guidelines for the care of SCD, including recommendations for the management of acute sickle cell pain in the ED. These guidelines provide a framework to understand the elements of ideal emergency sickle cell pain care; however, they do not provide guidance on barriers and facilitators to achieving these ideals in the complex system of the ED. Presented in this article are 4 tenets of implementing guideline-adherent emergency sickle cell care gleaned from the available literature and continuous quality improvement efforts at our institution. These include: (1) strategies to reduce negative provider attitudes toward patients with SCD; (2) strategies to reduce time-to-first-dose of analgesic medication; (3) strategies to improve ED pain care beyond the first dose of medication; and (4) strategies to improve ED patient safety. Application of the principles discussed within can improve patient and provider satisfaction, quality, and safety.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 16%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 19 27%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 17%
Psychology 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 23%