| Title |
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for the Use of Potent Volatile Anesthetic Agents and Succinylcholine in the Context of RYR1 or CACNA1S Genotypes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/cpt.1319 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen G. Gonsalves, Robert T. Dirksen, Katrin Sangkuhl, Rebecca Pulk, Maria Alvarellos, Teresa Vo, Keiko Hikino, Dan Roden, Teri E. Klein, S. Mark Poler, Sephalie Patel, Kelly E. Caudle, Ronald Gordon, Barbara Brandom, Leslie G. Biesecker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 75% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Poland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,123,481
of 24,366,830 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#350
of 4,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,182
of 445,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#8
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,366,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.