| Title |
Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider—a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41436-018-0391-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen L. David, Robert G. Best, Leslie Manace Brenman, Lynn Bush, Joshua L. Deignan, David Flannery, Jodi D. Hoffman, Ingrid Holm, David T. Miller, James O’Leary, Reed E. Pyeritz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 26% |
| Unknown | 29 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#2,727
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,434
of 444,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#69
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.