| Title |
BRCA Challenge: BRCA Exchange as a global resource for variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Genetics, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007752 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa S. Cline, Rachel G. Liao, Michael T. Parsons, Benedict Paten, Faisal Alquaddoomi, Antonis Antoniou, Samantha Baxter, Larry Brody, Robert Cook-Deegan, Amy Coffin, Fergus J. Couch, Brian Craft, Robert Currie, Chloe C. Dlott, Lena Dolman, Johan T. den Dunnen, Stephanie O. M. Dyke, Susan M. Domchek, Douglas Easton, Zachary Fischmann, William D. Foulkes, Judy Garber, David Goldgar, Mary J. Goldman, Peter Goodhand, Steven Harrison, David Haussler, Kazuto Kato, Bartha Knoppers, Charles Markello, Robert Nussbaum, Kenneth Offit, Sharon E. Plon, Jem Rashbass, Heidi L. Rehm, Mark Robson, Wendy S. Rubinstein, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Sean Tavtigian, Adrian Thorogood, Can Zhang, Marc Zimmermann, John Burn, Stephen Chanock, Gunnar Rätsch, Amanda B. Spurdle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 30% |
| Australia | 7 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| India | 4 | 4% |
| China | 2 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 62% |
| Scientists | 27 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#381,786
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#220
of 9,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,400
of 449,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#8
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.