| Title |
Third- or Later-line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Reviewing Best Practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Colorectal Cancer, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.11.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Richard Kim, Tae Won Kim, Juan Manuel O'Connor, John H Strickler, David Malka, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Feng Bi, Kensei Yamaguchi, Takayuki Yoshino, Gerald W Prager |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 34% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,430,732
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Colorectal Cancer
#196
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,618
of 336,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Colorectal Cancer
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.